¶1The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.
¶2Affirmed.