Tucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · 351 So. 2d 972 - McArthur v. State · Jaramillo v. State · Arant v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prove beyond a reasonable doubt (1) that [the defendant] had knowledge of the contraband and (2) that [the defendant] had the ability to exercise dominion and control over the contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Such proof may be offered through a defendant's own statements, witness testimony, scientific evidence, or incriminating circumstances other than mere proximity to the contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]lthough the circumstances were indeed suspicious, suspicion is not enough to support a conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.