Rogers v. Wiggins’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 714 So. 2d 356 - Bitterman v. Bitterman · Perez v. Perez · 867 So. 2d 1198 - Elliott v. Elliott · Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under' this scheme, the financial resources of the parties are the primary factor to be considered. However, other relevant circumstances to be considered include factors such as the scope and history of the litigation; the duration of the litigation; the merits of the respective positions; whether the litigation is brought or maintained primarily to harass (or whether a defense is raised mainly to frústrate or stall); and the existence and course of prior or pending litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myrick v. Myrick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.