Hamilton v. State

Decided October 31, 1917

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1917-10-31

<p>Criminal Law <§=>1090(1) — Appea]>-Bill oe Exceptions — Statement oe Facts — Necessity.</p> <p>Where the indictment is apparently regular, there is nothing to review in the absence of a statement of facts, or bills of exceptions.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1917-10-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1991

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MORROW, J.

¶1The conviction under the indictment is for robbery, and penalty fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for seven years.

¶2The indictment appears regular, and ih the absence of statement of facts or bills of exceptions we find nothing to review.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.