¶1 Order
¶2 Ronnie Rhodes appeals his conviction of second-degree burglary. Rhodes’ sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred *207 in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, in entering a judgment of conviction for second-degree burglary, and in sentencing him for second-degree burglary because the State’s evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for second-degree burglary, in that the State’s evidence did not show beyond a reasonable doubt that he actually knew that it was unlawful for him to be in the classroom and conference room portions of a building open to the public.
¶3 Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).