Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

198 S.W.3d 654

Haarup v. Haarup

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-08-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Paul Haarup (Father) appeals from the judgment denying his motion to modify custody with regard to his daughter, Brit-ny. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.

¶3 AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

/198/sw3d/654 · .json · Public domain