Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1979
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gillespie v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““20-1513. Mistake apparent in record. — Every mistake apparent on the face of the record may be corrected by the court at any term after final judment, at the discretion of the court. [Code 1858, § 2878 (deriv. Acts 1855-1856, ch. 70, § 2); Shan., § 4598; Code 1932, § 8722.]” “The rules of this Court recite that every transcript in a criminal case is composed of (1) the technical record and (2) the bill of exceptions. It defines the technical record as ‘all the minute entries pertaining to the case, including the indictment.’ ” Bailey v. State, 198 Tenn. 354 , 280 S.W.2d 806 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.