Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
November 1995
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 3 Smith & H. 85 - Haley v. State · State v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Any person who shall obtain, with fraudulent intent, money, or other property which may be the subject of larceny, or who shall obtain credit with like intent, by means of a check, draft, or order, of which he is the maker or drawer, which is not paid by the drawee, shall be guilty * * * ’.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCormick v. State““We think the passing of the two worthless checks was to all intents and purposes a single transaction. [[Image here]] If the [first] check ... was a fraud on the payee, as it clearly was, the [second] one ... as a substitute for it was no less a fraud....””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Madani
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.