Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 TENN 439 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 3 Smith & H. 85 - Haley v. State · State v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Any person who shall obtain, with fraudulent intent, money, or other property which may be the subject of larceny, or who shall obtain credit with like intent, by means of a check, draft, or order, of which he is the maker or drawer, which is not paid by the drawee, shall be guilty * * * ’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We think the passing of the two worthless checks was to all intents and purposes a single transaction. [[Image here]] If the [first] check ... was a fraud on the payee, as it clearly was, the [second] one ... as a substitute for it was no less a fraud....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.