Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 Wash. 605 - State v. Tully

State v. Tully’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Commonwealth v. Townsend (1968), City of Seattle v. Montana (1996)

41 state decisions

140193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Le Pitre · In Re Rameriz · 76 Cal. App. 227 - People v. McCloskey · Ex Parte Thomas · State v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(e) It shall be unlawful for any person who is under indictment or who has been convicted of a crime of violence or who is fugitive from justice to ship, transport, or cause to be shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm or ammunition. “(f) It shall be unlawful for any person who has been convicted of a crime of violence or is a fugitive from justice to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerbe, and the possession of a firearm or ammunition by any such person shall be presumptive evidence that such firearm or ammunition was shipped or transported or received, as the case may be, by such person in violation of this chapter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.