198 Wis. 2d 820 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Santobello v. New York · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Nix v. Whiteside
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether counsel's deficient performance renders the result of the trial unreliable or the proceeding fundamentally unfair.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“apparently ignored the prosecutor's recommendation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“result of the proceeding would have been different,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.