198 W. Va. 620 - State v. Crabtree’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
82 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 204 W. Va. 58 - State v. Rodoussakis (1998), 204 W. Va. 449 - State v. Myers (1998)
82 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Singleton v. Wulff · Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hormel v. Helvering
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having induced an error, a party in a normal case may not at a later stage of the trial use the error to set aside its immediate and adverse consequences.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen there has been a knowing and intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right, there is no error and the inquiry as to the effect of a deviation from the rule of law need not be determined.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our review of a trial court's ruling to admit or exclude evidence [is] premised on a permissible view of the law, [and] is only for an abuse of discretion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.