Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 W. Va. 702 - State v. Smith

198 W. Va. 702 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · United States v. Salerno · Addington v. Texas · Trop v. Dulles · O'Connor v. Donaldson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) After the entry of a judgment of not guilty by reason of mental illness, mental retardation or addiction, the court of record shall determine on the record the offense of which the person otherwise would have been convicted, and the maximum sentence he could have received. The court shall commit such defendant to a mental health facility under the jurisdiction of the department of health, with the court retaining jurisdiction over the defendant for the maximum sentence period. (b) If the defendant is released from an inpatient mental health facility while under the jurisdiction of the court, the court may impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the safety of the public.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “West Virginia Code §§ 27-6A-3 and -4 (Supp.1996), read in pari materia, generally provide a court flexibility in exercising and retaining its jurisdiction up to the maximum sentence period, with consideration given to the current mental state and dangerousness of a person found not guilty by reason of mental illness. If not sooner terminated by the court, its jurisdiction automatically will expire at the end of the maximum sentence period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.