Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1982 OK 133 - Summey v. Tisdale

Summey v. Tisdale’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2024

10 state decisions

4019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neel v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF CHEROKEE CTY. · Nixon v. Roberts · Board of County Commissioners v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Board functions as a watchdog agency which is empowered to require adequate and accurate reporting of finances and expenditures for all budgets and supplemental purposes and to review all appropriations and requests to determine if they are legal and adequately funded .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.