Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently June 1988 · most notably Anderson v. State (1922), Knowles v. Blue (1923)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. State · Prince v. State · Patton v. State · McLaughlin v. Mencke · Magness v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The range of external circumstances from which probable bias may be inferred is infinite. Too much refinement in analyzing their probable effect is out of place. Accurate concrete rules are almost impossible to formulate, and where possible are usually undesirable. In general, these circumstances should have some clearly apparent force, as tested by experience of human nature, or, as usually put, they should not be too remote.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adler v. Miller““Bias in common acceptance covers all varieties of hostility or prejudice against the opponent personally, or of favor to the proponent personally.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.