Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Ariz. 352 - State v. Pereyra

State v. Pereyra’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · Calik v. Kongable · State v. Riggs · Marriage of Fenn v. Fenn · State v. Deddens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any person who is convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia is eligible for probation. The court shall suspend the sentence and place the person on probation. C. Personal possession or use of a controlled substance pursuant to this section shall not include possession for sale, production, manufacturing or transportation for sale of any controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to free prison space for drug dealers and violent offenders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “notwithstanding any law to the contrary,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.