Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 BR 417 - In re Pullara

In re Pullara’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 1997
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 522

Relies on Dewsnup v. Timm · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Lieb v. Topstone Industries, Inc. · White v. General Motors Corp. · Adamson v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a hearing is not requested timely by a party in interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.