Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 BR 586 - In Re Scott

In Re Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Owen v. Owen · Vasilion v. Vasilion · Cheeseman v. Nachman · Oliver v. Givens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a debt of the kind specified in section 523(a)(1) or 523(a)(5) of this title; or (2) a debt secured by a lien that is— (A)(1) not avoided under subsection (f) or (g) of this section or under section 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a) of this title; and (ii) not void under section 506(d) of this title; or (B) a tax lien, notice of which is properly filed; or (3) a debt of a kind specified in section 523(a)(4) or 523(a)(6) of this title owed by an institution-affiliated party of an insured depository institution to a Federal depository institutions regulatory agency acting in its capacity as conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent for such institution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This allows the states to opt out of section 522(d), as the Code expressly permits, while giving full effect to the remaining provisions of section 522 and deferring to Congress’ enactments. Such a reading of the statute furthers the overall policy goals of the bankruptcy process such as ensuring uniformity under a federal distribution scheme, providing a debtor with a fresh start, and treating classes of creditors equally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[u]nless the case is dismissed, property exempted under this section is not liable during or after the case for any debt of the debtor that arose . . . . before the commencement of the case .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.