Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 BR 643 - In Re Young

In Re Young’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2025

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Caminetti v. United States · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “modify[ing] the rights of holders of secured claims ... secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's principal residence .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as modified pursuant to section 1325(a)(5)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) Subject to subsections (a) and (c) of this section, the plan may— (2) modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence, or of holders of unsecured claims, or leave unaffected the rights of holders of any class of claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.