Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Cal. 286 - Aronson & Co. v. Pearson

Aronson & Co. v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
October 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1964

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

17019261930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wenban Estate, Inc. v. Hewlett · Martin v. Becker · County of San Luis Obispo v. Gage · Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. Wentworth · Ellsworth v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The same principle is expressed in Thompson on Corporations (2d Ed.), §4790, as follows: “ ‘This liability is not imposed upon stockholders without their consent, for the reason that, Avhere such a statute or constitutional provision exists when a person becomes a stockholder in a corporation, he impliedly at least agrees to become liable to the extent prescribed. In other words, such a provision, under familiar principles, becomes incorporated in, and a part of, the undertaking of the stockholder, and is therefore said to be the result of his stockholder’s agreement, and is contractual in its nature. ’ “The constitutional and statutory provisions relating to the liability of stockholders become essential terms of the subscription agreement of a stockholder as fully as if they were set forth at length therein. By accepting ownership of stock in a corporation, the stockholder in effect offers to make payment, to the extent of his stockholder’s liability, to any person who may extend credit to the corporation during the period of his ownership. Whenever, during such ownership, any person so extends credit to the corporation, ‘the offer and the act (of extending credit) combined make a complete contract’ between the stockholder and the creditor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While all the rules relating to the liability of a guarantor are not applicable to a stockholder’s liability, the obligation of the latter is in the nature of a continuing guaranty of payment of debts contracted by the corporation during his ownership of stock and to the extent provided by the Constitution. The liability of a guarantor is distinct and independent of that of the principal debtor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.