Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Cal. App. 3d 858 - Eddy v. Sharp

199 Cal. App. 3d 858 - Eddy v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (2013), 225 Cal. App. 3d 1602 - Passavanti v. Williams (1990)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions

2501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 40 - Weirum v. RKO General, Inc. · 1 Cal. 3d 586 - United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. · 24 Cal. 3d 773 - Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co. · 4 Cal. 3d 842 - Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc. · Gagne v. Bertran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “responsibility for negligent misrepresentation rests upon the existence of a legal duty ... owed by a defendant to the injured person.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[m]isrepresentation of a past or existing material fact, without reasonable ground for believing it to be true, and with intent to induce another's reliance on the fact misrepresented; ignorance of the truth and justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation by the party to whom it was directed; and resulting damage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.