Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Colo. 486 - People v. Swazo

People v. Swazo’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably People v. Higinbotham (1986), People v. Shreck (2004)

37 state decisions

2501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 41 Colo. App. 206 - People v. Lopez · Chambers v. District Court in & for Cty. of Arapahoe · Simakis v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUD., ETC. · Simakis v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no court of this state shall any longer have jurisdiction thereof, nor shall the untried indictment, information, or criminal complaint be of any further force or effect, and the court shall dismiss it with prejudice. Section 16-14-104 (emphasis added).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Although [the Uniform Act and the Interstate Agreement on Detainers] apply to different situations, they reflect the same policy of assuring speedy trials. Therefore, the enunciated principles for one can be applied to the [other] unless the provisions conflict.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “burden for compliance with the time requirements [of the Uniform Act] is on the prosecution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.