Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 F.1d 356 - In re Brown

In re Brown’s Empirical Analysis

199 F. 356 · 1912

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 1914
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re Blalock · In re Brockman · In re Keefer · In re Isaac Prager & Son

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “••When from certain acts or omissions two inferences may be drawn, the one pointing to a guilty or bad intent and the other perfectly consistent with honesty, * - « it is the duty of the court to find in favor of honesty of purpose and intent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.