Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 F.2d 276 - Howard v. United States

Howard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

199 F.2d 276 · 1952

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
November 1981
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1981

5 federal appellate ·

401952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sturm · Birtch v. United States · Ray v. United States · Morales v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.