Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 F.2d 374

Docket No. 11593.

Van Beek v. Jacques

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-10-24

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 1964

16 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1952-10-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Frank G. Millard, Perry A. Maynard, Lansing, Mich., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This cause came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the Assistant Attorney General of Michigan and the attorney appointed by this court to represent appellant, and also on the separate brief filed by appellant in his own behalf;

¶2

And it appearing that there is no merit in any point presented in behalf of appellant and that the judgment of the District Court is correct, for the reasons given by the district judge in denying appellant's petition for certificate of probable cause;

¶3

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

/199/f2d/374 · .json · Public domain