Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 F.2d 446 - Wright Lumber Co. v. Herron

Wright Lumber Co. v. Herron’s Empirical Analysis

199 F.2d 446 · 1952

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1999

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

6019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co. · Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. United Casualty Co. · Thatcher Implement & Mercantile Co. v. Brubaker · 58 F. Supp. 132 - Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The written- proposal specifically stated -that they requested that such alleged contractual breaches should be submitted to arbitration and requested the selection of an arbitrator, as provided for in Article 12, so ‘that such dispute and disagreement as may exist between the parties as to your breach of said contract, aforesaid, may be determined and a decision made.’ Upon a receipt of this notice,- Wright, likewise in writing, made a counter-accusation and demand for arbitration. * * * These two writings determined the scope of inquiry by the arbitrators * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.