Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 F.2d 756

Docket No. Undocketed.

Kyle v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 3, 1952.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-11-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1956

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ferguson v. Swope · Minntole v. Johnston · In re Snow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Arnold Thomas Kyle, in pro. per.

¶2No other appearances were entered.

¶3Before STEPHENS, ’HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Arnold Thomas Kyle, the petitioner herein, has petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Oregon for a speedy trial or dismissal of an indictment returned to the above mentioned district court. The petition was denied in toto and' petitioner seeks to appeal in forma pauperis and has presented his application to this court for permission to do so.

¶6No showing is made that such a petition for permission to appeal in forma pauperis has been made or presented to the court from which the appeal has been taken, and for that reason the petition is denied. Smith v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F.2d 152-155; Minntole v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 944; see also In re Snow, 9 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 1006.

¶7Denied.

/199/f2d/756 · .json · Public domain