In re Nelson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Not. 7, 1952.

Decided Nov. 8, 1952.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-11-08

1 counsel of record

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207

Relies on Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel · Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp. · Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-11-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1975

9 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bertram Edises, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioners.

¶2Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The Court of Appeals is asked to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on behalf of persons under indictment and about to be brought' to trial in that district. The basis for the demand for this extraordinary relief is that the district court has denied a motion for change of venue predicated upon a claim that the feeling against the defendants in the city where the case is to be tried has been aroused to the point where they .cannot get a fair trial. We do not think mandamus lies. The point raised can be reviewed normally and appropriately after final judgment, if that becomes necessary.

¶5The motion will be denied.