Damsky v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis
199 F.3d 527 · 2000
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2020
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Levene & Eisenberg v. Gold Coast Asset Acquisition, L. P. · Freeman Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Nuclear Information Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Brookens v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot claim that any notice defects surprised or misled it with regard to the issues [appellant] intended to raise on appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“brought the [challenged order] before this court for review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.