Ramirez v. Koromilas’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8102 · 5 U.S.C. § 8123 · 5 U.S.C. § 8124 · 5 U.S.C. § 8128 · 5 U.S.C. § 8145 · 5 U.S.C. § 8149
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bell v. Hood · Armstrong v. Manzo · Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is prohibited from challenging the merits of the Department of Labor's decision to suspend his compensation benefits, as such review on the merits of any aspect of his claim is precluded under 5 U.S.C. § 8128 (b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nurriddin v. Acosta“[a] viable equal protection claim ... must allege that similarly situated persons were intentionally treated differently and the facts pled must be specific.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nurriddin v. Acosta“Merely affixing a constitutional label to an otherwise precluded claim ... will not suffice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nurriddin v. Acosta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.