Camacho v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1990
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1971 (Civil Rights Act of 1957)
Relies on Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Edye v. Robertson · Davis v. Beason · Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections · Fitts v. McGhee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not suggest that any standards which a State desires to adopt may be required of voters. But there is wide scope for exercise of its jurisdiction. Residence requirements, age, previous criminal record (Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333, 345-347 [ 10 S.Ct. 299, 301-302 , 33 L.Ed. 637 ]) are obvious examples indicating factors which a State may take into consideration in determining the qualifications of voters. The ability to read and write likewise has some relation to standards designed to promote intelligent use of the ballot.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.