199 F. Supp. 710 - Schwentner v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 12 Ill. 2d 231 - People Ex Rel. Terry v. Fisher · Superior Insurance v. Superior Court · 167 Cal. App. 2d 391 - Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO · 178 Cal. App. 2d 680 - Pettie v. Superior Court · Johanek v. Aberle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Scope of Discovery. Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of discovery is as follows: (1) In General. Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.