199 F. Supp. 3d 244 - Simon v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1451
Relies on Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets · Mulcahey · Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. · Republic of Venezuela v. Philip Morris Inc. · 568 F. Supp. 2d 28 - Downey v. Ambassador Development, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because a ... district court, acting sua sponte , may raise the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction, a court may also issue a remand order on its own initiative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.