Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Ill. App. 3d 1032 - People v. Devine

199 Ill. App. 3d 1032 - People v. Devine’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2023

7 state decisions

501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Ill. 2d 149 - People v. Perruquet · 47 Ill. 2d 510 - The People v. Montgomery · 104 Ill. 2d 194 - People v. Lynch · 34 Ill. 2d 530 - The PEOPLE v. Cage · 123 Ill. 2d 387 - People v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under this balancing test, character evidence offered by the accused to show the complainant’s propensity to violence is admissible because the danger of undue prejudice to the accused lies in not admitting such evidence. [Citation.] On the other hand, similar character evidence offered by the prosecution to show the accused’s propensity to violence is generally inadmissible because the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant in being portrayed as a ‘bad man’ substantially outweighs the probative value of the evidence. [Citation.] Such evidence of bad character may be introduced by the prosecution only if the defendant first opens the door by introducing evidence of good character to show that he is a quiet and peaceful person.” Randle, 147 Ill. App. 3d at 625 , 498 N.E.2d at 736 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.