199 Ill. App. 3d 665 - Koca v. Gavin’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 28 Ill. App. 3d 60 - Banks v. United Insurance Co. of America · 59 Ill. App. 3d 552 - Chapman v. Foggy · 65 Ill. App. 3d 669 - Redmond v. Central Community Hospital · 133 Ill. App. 3d 348 - Perlman v. Time, Inc. · 15 Ill. 2d 363 - City of Champaign v. Roseman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the instant case, defendant has argued that he prepared for trial based upon the unanswered requests to admit, and because he had relied upon plaintiff’s admissions, he did not present the testimony of an expert witness to counter the evidence presented by plaintiff’s expert. Plaintiff has never filed a sworn statement, timely or otherwise, denying any of the facts asserted in defendant’s request to admit. Moreover, plaintiff did not bring a motion asserting good cause for an extension of time to respond under Supreme Court Rule 183 (107 Ill. 2d R. 183). Consequently, the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s answers, and it was an abuse of discretion to allow the filing of an untimely and unsworn response.” (Emphasis added.) Koca, 199 Ill. App. 3d at 672-73 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.