Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Ind. 235 - Sanchez v. State

Sanchez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
6
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson (1932), MacKenna v. Ellis (1960)

13 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

180192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Nitti · Castro v. State · People v. Schulman · Houston v. Bruner · Kochel v. Bartlett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “he could procure witnesses and have forcible process to obtain them in defendant's behalf.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the instant case, the attorney who appeared for the defendant was voluntarily employed by him. But it should be taken into consideration that the appellant was only eighteen years old, was a citizen of another country, and, according to the motion for a new trial, ‘did not understand legal procedure and did not understand the English language.’ He employed the attorney who tendered his services to him, naturally believing that he had sufficient experience and enough ability to conduct properly his defense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““And mere perfunctory action- by an attorney assuming to represent one accused of crime which falls short of presenting the evidence favorable to him and invoking the rules of law intended to prevent conviction for an offense of which the accused is innocent, or the imposition of a penalty more severe than is deserved, should not be tolerated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.