Green v. Kensinger’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 16 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Schneider v. Washington National Insurance (1968), The Dow Chemical Corporation v. Weevil-Cide Company, Inc. Research Products Company Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (1990)
5 federal appellate · 16 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 54 Cal. 2d 717 - Jefferson v. J. E. French Co. · Zeibak v. Nasser · Bruner v. Martin · Hartman v. Stumbo · Jarnagin v. Ditus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the cause of action has arisen in another state or country and by the laws of the state or country where the cause of action arose an action cannot be maintained thereon by reason of lapse of time, no action can be maintained thereon in this state except in favor of one who is a resident of this state and who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Under K.S.A. 60-516 the statute of limitations of California is applicable if the cause of action arose in that state. In determining where a cause of action arises, this court in the early case of Bruner v. Martin, 76 Kan. 862 , 93 P. 165 , 14 L.R.A.,N.S., 775 held: ‘The words “where the cause of action has arisen in another state,” as used in the statute of limitation * * * mean the cause of action has accrued in a foreign state, or, in other words, when the plaintiff has the right to sue the defendant in the courts of such foreign state; and they have no reference to the origin of the transaction out of which the cause of action arose.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The right to an account of his interest shall accrue to any partner, or his legal representative, as against the winding up partners or the surviving partners or the person or partnership continuing the business, at the date of dissolution, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramseyer v. Ramseyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.