Bogle v. Conway’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp. (1997), Parsons v. Continental National American Group (1976)
6 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. Eggleston · Henry v. Johnson · Brandon v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. · Snedker Ex Rel. Snedker v. Derby Oil Co. · Bogle v. Conway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a liability insurer which assumes the defense of an action against the insured may save itself from the bar of waiver or estop-pel in a subsequent action upon the policy if, in the action against the insured, it clearly disclaims liability under the policy, and gives notice of its reservation of a right to set up the defense of noncoverage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“make an intelligent decision whether to consent to the assumption of his defense and the control of his lawsuit by the carrier, or to take another course.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"the insured must be fairly and timely informed of the insurer's position. That information should include the basis for the position taken by the insurer. Only then is the insured in a position to make his choice as to the course to pursue in protecting himself. The insured may or may not wish to permit the insurer to carry on his defense under its contract obligation to do so. We think that is the import underlying Henry v. Johnson . (See annotation and cases cited at 38 A.L.R. 2d 1148 and A.L.R. 2d Later Case Service; also 7A Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice [1962] § 4694.)" (Emphasis added.) Bogle , 199 Kan. at 713 , 433 P.2d 407 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.