Bingham v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2008
2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dukes v. Davis · Kash v. Strong · Ramey v. Francis, Day & Co. · Tichenor v. Yankey · Riggs v. Stevens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Either party may appeal from the judgment of the circuit court to the court of appeals by giving bond to the clerk of the circuit court, with good surety, conditioned for the payment of all costs and damages the other party may sustain by reason of the appeal and by filing the record in the clerk’s office of the court of appeals, within thirty days after the final judgment in the circuit court.” Section 1596a-12, Ky. Stats.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whitt v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.