Abbott v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1988 · most notably Vicknair v. Vicknair (1959), Loyacano v. Loyacano (1978)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fortier v. Gelpi · Player v. Player · State v. Humble Oil a Refining Co. · Jackson v. Burns · Cupples v. Cupples
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under the provisions of Article 160 of the Civil Code, it was within the discretion of the trial judge to grant or to deny the alimony claimed by plaintiff. The discretion referred to in the codal article means sound discretion, to be exercised by the trial judge, not arbitrarily or wilfully, but with regard to what is just and proper under the facts of the case."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This alimony shall be revocable in case it should become unnecessary, and in case the wife should contract a second marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.