Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 La. 965 - State v. Breedlove

State v. Breedlove’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson (1994), State v. Reese (1967)

59 state decisions

16019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Henry · State v. Messer · State v. Fourchy · State v. McCoy · State v. Joiner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No defendant can complain of any ruling sustaining or refusing to sustain a challenge for cause, unless his peremptory challenges shall have been exhausted before the completion of the panel; moreover, the erroneous allowance of challenges for cause affords the defendant no ground of complaint, unless the effect of such ruling is the exercise by the prosecution of more peremptory challenges than it is entitled to by law, or unless the defendant by such ruling is forced to accept an obnoxious juror.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f the defendant ... is deprived of one of his twelve peremptory challenges, by being compelled by an erroneous ruling of the judge to use a peremptory challenge in order to get rid of a disqualified or incompetent juror, and if the defendant's peremptory challenges are exhausted in the impaneling of the jury, the erroneous ruling "constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the number of challenges to be fixed by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.