Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Md. 110 - Powers v. Malach

Powers v. Malach’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1972
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kvedera v. Mondravitzky · Blenard v. Blenard · Adkins & Douglas Co. v. Webb · Twilley v. Bromley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Too often and too recently this court has held that the relationship of husband and wife, with knowledge by her of his intention to make improvements on her property and failure on her part to object, does not make him her agent in making the improvements and does not amount to a holding out which creates an agency by estoppel. Twilley v. Bromley, 192 Md. 465, 470-472 , 64 A. 2d 553 ; Blenard v. Blenard, 185 Md. 548, 558 , 45 A. 2d 335 ; Adkins & Douglas Co. v. Webb, 160 Md. 571, 577 , 154 A. 259 ; Kvedera v. Mondravitzky, 145 Md. 260, 263 , 125 A. 591 . Emancipation of the wife from the husband’s common law dominion might be appreciably undone if he, as such, were made her general agent.” Id. at 113.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.