Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 Minn. 422 - Ingelson v. Olson

Ingelson v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
8
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 1991

1 district · 22 state decisions

501937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stearns Co of Boston Mass v. United States · Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. · Grafton v. . Moir · Burgas v. Stoutz · 70 Cal. App. 283 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Estimate is used in order that the intention of the parties shall not be defeated by attempted precision, which at the time is not possible. They are words of safety and precaution, intended to cover some slight or unimportant inaccuracy, for an adjustment, if necessary, of distance or quantity." (Emphasis by Chief Justice Calvert in Bickler, supra.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he grantor has the right in the first instance to designate and locate the roadway, and, if reasonably suitable for the purpose, a selection of a place cannot be questioned. If the grantor omits to exercise this right, the grantee may make the selection and his selection will be upheld unless he has abused the right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““* * * The statute dealing with holidays * * * contains different prohibitions. Service of process is absolutely prohibited. The transaction of public business on such days is not absolutely prohibited, but is lawful and the thing done valid ‘in case of necessity.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.