In re Di Brizzi’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1952
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matter of Doyle · People, Ex Rel. McDonald v. . Keeler · Dunham v. Ottinger · People v. . Abeel · Matter of Dairymen's League Cooperative Assn v. Murtagh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ The power to investigate and examine witnesses to the end of a better discharge of their duties has been conferred upon administrative boards and officials without successful challenge by so many statutes that it is undesirable to refer to them all. * * * ‘ ‘ The power here attacked is akin to that right of the Legislature to investigate and to subpoena and examine witnesses to the end of safeguarding public interests by appropriate legislation and which is so well established as to have passed beyond the realm of controversy. (People ex rel. McDonald v. Keeler, 99 N. Y. 463 .) ” Thus, the only question here presented is whether the investigation directed by the Governor can reason ably be said to be for the purpose of securing information to advise him in his executive function.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Di Brizzi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.