Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 Misc. 821

Willis v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1951-03-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1963

2 state decisions

Relies on Copeland v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Plaintiff became nauseous and ill immediately upon discovering that she was drinking from a Coca Cola bottle which contained pieces of cork from a crushed bottle cap that was in the bottle. An action for breach of an implied warranty does not lie on these facts. (Copeland v. Woolworth Co., 62 N. Y. S. 2d 660.) Nor can plaintiff recover if the claim is that the continued illness was caused by drinking the beverage. There was no proof that the cork and bottle cap rendered the beverage unfit for human consumption, nor any evidence to show that the illness was due to the condition of the beverage. (Weinberg v. Doelger Brewing Co., 174 N. Y. S. 69.)

¶2The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and judgment directed for defendant dismissing the complaint on the merits, with costs.

¶3■Hoestadteb, Schbeibee and Hecht, JJ., concur.

¶4Judgment reversed, etc.

/199/misc/821 · .json · Public domain