State v. Baum’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “we're still pursuing her claim for economic losses” up to the time when plaintiff found new employment, five months after UMDNJ terminated her. During the deposition, Dr. Sharma's counsel reminded plaintiff’s counsel about Rule 4:1-4—3(f) (regarding the limitations placed on communication between a deponent and counsel once a deposition commences). The judge issued the order verbally. Plaintiff suggested that her deposition occur on a Saturday. Thus, the judge rejected her argument that the tax returns were irrelevant to her emotional distress claim, as he previously had determined that "I’m going to allow a full exploration of all aspects of the emotional harm that is claimed and I don’t mean that in a narrow sense.” At this point, it was approaching four years after she had filed her complaint. Plaintiff failed to respond to the defense's document demands for tax documents and the name of her immigration attorney. “[T]he United States Supreme Court has never interpreted [the Fifth Amendment] to create a broader right that would extend that protection to a third party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Fik-Rymarkiewicz v. University of Medicine & Dentistry