State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Harris v. State (2018), Lewin v. Attorney Gen. of the U.S. (2018)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. Williams · Coffin v. United States · State v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the uncalled witness is peculiarly within the control or power of only the one party, or that there is a special relationship between the party and the witness or the party has superior knowledge of the identity of the witness or of the testimony the witness might be expected to give; (2) that the witness is available to that party both practically and physically; (3) that the testimony of the uncalled witness will elucidate relevant and critical facts in issue[;] and (4) that such testimony appears to be superior to that already utilized in respect to the fact to be proven. [ 199 N.J. at 561-62 , 974 A.2d 403 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Hickman, 204 N.J.Super. 409, 414 , 499 A.2d 231 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 103 N.J. 495 , 511 A.2d 667 (1986)).]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is well settled that due process requires the State to prove each element of a charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it was the State's exclusive burden to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.