Schatz v. Jerke’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1980
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vaux v. Hamilton · Klein v. Harper · Kuntz v. Stelmachuk · Mitzel v. Schatz · Froemke v. Hauff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An award of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the award is so excessive or so inadequate as to be without support in the evidence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment; and in granting or refusing temporary injunctions the court shall similarly set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law which constitute the grounds of its action. Requests for findings are not necessary for purposes of review. Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial coxirt to judge of the credibility of the witnesses. . ” [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferguson v. Ferguson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.