Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 199 NW2D 921 - Brusegaard v. Schroeder

Brusegaard v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bonde v. Stern · Haman v. McHenry County · Haaland v. Verendrye Electric Cooperative

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provisions in this rule (62) do not limit any power of an appellate court or of a judge or justice thereof to stay proceedings during the pendency of an appeal or to suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction during the pendency of an appeal’ or to make any order appropriate to preserve the status quo or the effectiveness of the judgment subsequently to be entered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The right of appeal from a final judgment is made unconditional; * * *” Brusegaard v. Schroeder, 199 N.W.2d 921, 926 (N.D.1972).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.