Ryan v. . Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1916
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brokaw v. . Duffy · City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad · Dougherty v. . Lion Fire Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A finding that there is no evidence is radically different from an affirmative finding which merely recites evidence, but contains no conclusion of fact.” Ryan v. Franklin, 199 N. Y. 347 , 92 N. E. 673 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The quoted findings are, therefore, findings that tbe plaintiff bas failed to establish that branch of bis case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.