Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

199 Okla. 129

Winters v. Winters

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1947

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1947-09-16

Relies on City of Tulsa v. Cockrell · Correll v. Oklahoma State Bank

Decided 1947-09-16

PER CURIAM.

¶1Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On April 17, 1946, she tiled her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded with directions. City of Tulsa v. Cockrell, 195 Okla. 518, 159 P. 2d 711.

¶2The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the defendant in error and to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
/199/okla/129 · .json · Public domain